//
Uncategorized

>A Plea for Compromise on the Right to Life issue

>
The political climate of today with those arguing between a pro-Final Solution and a “right to life” for Jews has met an impasse. Some want to ban the killing of Jews altogether (regardless of the threat to Germans’ lives) and then others want complete access to Final Solution options, even for those Jews able to work and contribute to the work camps. Such polarization has not been advantageous to the debate. We on the pro-Final Solution side have properly pointed out that if the Final Solution is banned, then people will be forced into back alley Final Solution methods, which may cause danger to the health of the German trying to eliminate the Jew (if resistance occurs). Now we can all agree that no one is really pro-Final Solution, it is a tragedy every time it happens. But shouldn’t we all work towards a goal of the Final Solution being safe, legal and less often chosen?

.

The Madagascar Plan has been proposed and perhaps we should look into it as a voluntary action. Perhaps we can provide monetary help for people that want to send the Jews in their area to the African island nation instead of extermination. All the time keeping in mind that if the option is too much pressure or time for the German people in that area to wait for, or if the Jews are particularly menacing, that the Final Solution option still be available to those Germans.

To those who are anti-Final Solution, I make an appeal. You agree with Chancellor Hitler in so many other areas in our 25-point plan. He has pledged to end the reign of corporate fat cats as in plank 11 of the National Socialist platform:

11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes.

Hitler also promises nationalization of the banks and industries that have victimized and kept Germans down:

13. We demand the nationalisation of all (previous) associated industries (trusts)

Hitler supports spreading the wealth around for those behind in line:

14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

He will expand Social Security:

15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare

Most of all, he fights for the middle class:

16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation

And will work to make sure the banks do not take your home:

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs

Sensible health care:

21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child

And Religious freedom:

24. We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state

Don’t these issues outweigh the single issue agenda of the “right to life” groups? Can’t we all work together to make Germany strong and work together in our disagreements on the Final Solution towards a reasonable compromise? Don’t be controlled by irrational fear mongering over the issue. You can be pro-life and vote for the National Socialist Workers party. We fight for you!.

Advertisements

Discussion

5 thoughts on “>A Plea for Compromise on the Right to Life issue

  1. >A little help for our friend OSO- Satire

    Posted by Dwight Watson | October 27, 2008, 1:14 am
  2. >”Calling your opponents Nazis is not going to solve anything.In fact, it is more likely to promote violence.”The comparisons Jared drew are a little subtle but not too much. Read it again and I’m sure you’ll be able to see them. If all you can see in the post is someone calling someone else a Nazi then it seems there’s a problem with your understanding of the post rather than the post itself. Unfortunately from comments you’ve made elsewhere I think you understand the argument perfectly well but are choosing to reduce what was said to calling people Nazis in order to disparage it.

    Posted by Jeff Wright | October 26, 2008, 1:23 pm
  3. >OSO,This comes from one who associates all white men from the South as black haters, slave lovers, and pro-KKK? Give me a break.

    Posted by Mark Mathews | October 26, 2008, 8:54 am
  4. >Calling your opponents Nazis is not going to solve anything.In fact, it is more likely to promote violence.

    Posted by One Salient Oversight | October 26, 2008, 6:22 am
  5. >That’s some pretty biting satire there, but the subject warrants it. You guys are a little over the top sometimes, but I appreciate that (in small doses).

    Posted by barrywallace | October 25, 2008, 7:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

From the Vault

Friend of Grace

Photobucket
All articles © 2007-2011 by the respective authors of the Conservative Reformed Mafia. All Rights Reserved.
%d bloggers like this: