//
Evangelicalism, Evangelicals converting to Roman Catholicism, Q and A with Dr. Bingham

>Liveblogging from The Forum of DTS’ Q&A with Dr. D. Jeffrey Bingham, Part One

>The Forum at Dallas Theological Seminary hosted a Q&A with Dr. D. Jeffrey Bingham on the topic of evangelicals converting to Catholicism on Wednesday, October 17th. The informal session was attended by over 30 DTS students and the discussion lasted almost two hours. After some brief but penetrating opening remarks, Dr. Bingham fielded questions from the students. I was on-hand to do some live-blogging from the event tonight.

This is the first semester for the new Academic Ministries Forum of DTS. Their webpage states: “Whether you plan on being a pastor, lay Bible teacher, or professional academician, your academic work at and beyond seminary is a vital ministry. The purpose of our student group is to serve students who are in the academic ministry track, and those who are excited about the ministry of their academic work.” I remember my conversations last year with current and founding Forum President Mark Howell when the student group was still in the brainstorming stages and its great to see it take off.

Dr. Bingham is a student favorite at DTS. I have had him as a professor for two church history courses and both courses were very impactful. D. Jeffrey Bingham, Th.M., Ph.D. is Department Chair and Professor of Theological Studies at DTS. His faculty page reads, “Dr. Bingham specializes in the study of early Christianity. He has written extensively on the early Christian church and his articles and essays have appeared in leading literary journals. Before joining the faculty of Dallas Seminary he pastored a church in West Texas and taught at several Christian colleges. He also has served as assistant dean for theological studies at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.”

Dr. Bingham opened the event with remarks concerning the phenomenon of evangelicals converting to Roman Catholicism. Why is this so attractive to some evangelicals?Bingham explained seven characteristics that evangelicals are seeking when they convert to Roman Catholicism that they cannot find in the free church tradition.

The first thing the RCC offers that the free church cannot is a connection to church history. The RCC enjoys a connectedness to the very 1st century of Christianity. On the other hand, there is no history of the free church. There are histories of individual free churches but no unified history of all free churches. There is no connection to the history of Christianity. Our individual free churches probably appeared sometime in the 1970’s but that’s about as far back as we can go.

Secondly, the RCC gives the appearance of unity. Free churches are characterized by diversity and disconnection. It is hard to find elements of unity among independent free churches while the RCC appears to give the promise of unity. It has always been the RCC and it has a line of popes traceable back to Peter.

Thirdly, the RCC offers universal representation while the free church has no universal representation that binds us all together. For example, if you go to Rome for the general audience in St. Peter’s Square on Wednesdays you would see a representative read from the Bible in all major languages. You can hear the word of God in your own language no matter where you are. The Pope gives a longer homily in Latin followed by shorter versions in other languages. The RCC ministers in the people’s own language rather than having the people conform to the language of the church.

Next, the RCC provides continuity of worship. Free churches do not have this. Each church will have a different sermon, different songs, different overheads, etc. We don’t know what each other is doing in other churches and we don’t care. We don’t even care what other services are doing within the same church. There is no continuity of worship and some evangelicals find this disconcerting. The RCC has a sacred calendar. The same text is preached in every RCC church worldwide. Same liturgy. Same mass. The same words are said. So, the RCC provides the appearance of continuity in worship.

Fifth, you can always depend on the RCC believing certain things. The RCC confesses Nicea, Constantinople, and Chalcedon. They have an orthodox view of Christ and the Trinity. With the free churches, we don’t know what they believe and sometimes nothing is even written down in order to find out what the church believes. For example, one evangelical church’s motto is “we have no tradition but change.” At least we know the RCC is orthodox on these issues.

Sixth, the RCC provides anthropological and cosmological unity. In the free church you find a dualism between the material and the immaterial. The interior, non-physical is emphasized while the bodily component is undervalued. The RCC brings the material and the immaterial into unity. During the mass, thanks is given for the bread and wine and then a miracle takes place. God transforms the bread into the body of Christ and the wine into the blood of Christ. The wine and bread (visible, physical) is a central component in worship. They are key elements of spirituality. God’s grace is working through what is material. Free churches separate this.

Lastly, the RCC provides a sense of the sacred and holy. What you do not sense in their service is informality. There is formality of the sacred and holy. You sense that God is “other.” The sensation you experience is that this is someplace sacred. Evangelical churches feel like an informal cafe, for example. Its laid back. Many evangelicals are getting sick of this and are looking for the sacred and holy.

All of these characteristics contribute to the evangelical hunger for conversion to the RCC. These characteristics have been expressed as someone who is seeking these things would express them. These characteristics are attractive but we don’t want to go to the RCC. Rather, we want to bring them into present-day evangelicalism. We can claim these characteristics as Christian rather than distinctively Roman.

This concludes Bingham’s opening remarks. Part Two will delve into the question and answer period which followed.

Advertisements

Discussion

3 thoughts on “>Liveblogging from The Forum of DTS’ Q&A with Dr. D. Jeffrey Bingham, Part One

  1. >Me,My experience of the Anglican Church is almost wholly outside the US. I have respect and fondness for her, but what I refer to is the attempt to keep disparate camps under one umbrella in hopes of creating a “via media” between Catholicism and evangelicalism. It’s coming apart, a phenomenon you can hardly confine just to the US.

    Posted by Gina | October 20, 2007, 9:50 pm
  2. >Gina,I’m not sure I can agree with your assessment of Anglicanism. Perhaps your point could be made if you are speaking purely of Anglicanism as it is represented in America. However, I recently moved to England and attend an Anglican church in Durham. I would invite you to attend a service here (although the airfare is outrageous) and see that it is anything but superficial or disconnected. These are some of the most sacred worship services I have ever attended. While the Anglican church here is not without its problems, I think the issues you raise are not the problems we face. I have also been in many Bible & Baptist churches in the US, both of which seem terribly man-centered and void of any intimate worship of the risen Savior. Thus, I think much of what you bring up is geographical. Could it be that America has “Americanized” the church to the point that the attributes Dr. Bingham speaks of are hard to find in the US outside the RCC? Just a thought.

    Posted by me | October 19, 2007, 4:58 pm
  3. >Thanks for your report, Jeff. Some good and honest analysis.I’m going to naturally disagree that you can bring in “the trappings” without the Tradition, more importantly the live connection, which sustains them. By doing so, in fact, you only increase the sense of superficiality and disconnectedness to which people are responding.Case in point: Anglicanism

    Posted by Gina | October 18, 2007, 3:30 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

From the Vault

Friend of Grace

Photobucket
All articles © 2007-2011 by the respective authors of the Conservative Reformed Mafia. All Rights Reserved.
%d bloggers like this: